I’ve often lost myself in the pleasant maze of delicate Shakespearean characters. There are so many. That routinely disturbed. And I wondered each time I floundered if it were I who failed him or him who failed me. To me Shakespearean characters have always appeared as representatives of emotions defined and delimited more by their distinctive psychic patterns than by the dramas they inhabited.
I call them rumblings as they grossly lack the structure and merits of a perfect read - yet clasp close as they reflect my inconstancy and joie de vivre - unyielding to any persuasion known to man (please accept 'lies' as incidental or embellished truths - as I strongly deny the existence of 'Lie' - it's always 'Truth' or otherwise...besides 'Truth' in its purity lacks imagination)...Happy Reading!
Monday, June 18, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
GOPESWAR PAUL…Bengal’s Donatello
It wasn’t perchance that the front of G. Paul’s studio appeared on the expansive cover of Raghu Rai’s INDIA – Reflections in Black & W...
-
The vision of 'the woman' varies irreconcilably across men (being a masculine thought I suppose and I don't mind being wrong)....
-
Death is theraputic.It seems through 'Death' Rajesh Khanna could reclaim the fabled stature he lost long back - something that ma...
-
I repeat...love the riddle, not the answer.
No comments:
Post a Comment